Skip to content

Principleसिद्धांत

Syadvada (Jain doctrine of conditional, many-sided truth)

स्याद्वाद

Extracted from the textNew name from the text6 references

The Jain doctrine that a thing has many aspects and can be described only relatively; the hitahita chapter uses it to argue that no substance is wholesome or unwholesome in every respect.

Names and synonyms

Sanskrit
स्याद्वादअनेकान्त
Hindi
स्याद्वादअनेकांतवाद
English
Syadvada (Jain doctrine of conditional, many-sided truth)

What the text says

Each statement reports the source, with its chapter, page and verse. Traditional descriptions are not presented as proven medical facts.

Historical3

  • The chapter opens by declaring that the first medical science is that of the Arhat (the Jina), and quotes a verse to the same effect, adding that in matters of the wholesome and the unwholesome it is to be known as the means of establishing syadvada.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 608Sanskrit verseTraditional description
  • The translation opens by settling that the first place in Ayurveda belongs to the Arhat's Ayurveda, because it is the means of establishing syadvada and is suited to engaging in the wholesome and turning away from the unwholesome.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 623Hindi commentaryTraditional description
  • Accepting the principles taught in the Jina's teaching and giving up the one-sided principles of others, this faultless science, like Lakshmi risen from the ocean of the great Pranavaya canon, is said to have come from the faultless physician who is the friend of the world, and physicians are said to accept it gladly and with great respect even today.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 625Hindi commentaryTraditional description

Other4

  • After its arguments, the text concludes that because things are many-sided (anekanta) by nature, the Arhat's medicine is established; it holds that all things are incompatible or compatible depending on substance, place, time and state.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 609Sanskrit verseTraditional description
  • Having described substance, taste, potency and vipaka as relative natures, existing and not existing, permanent and impermanent, one and many, expressible and inexpressible, according to substance, place, time and state, the text says that Sushruta too relies on syadvada, and that by these and many other verses his description of things as substance and quality rests on it.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 610Sanskrit verseTraditional description
  • Because by substance, place, time and state all things, though incompatible, become compatible, things are said to have many-sided natures, and so the Ayurveda taught in the Jain teaching is called the best for all beings.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 624Hindi commentaryTraditional description
  • Things are said to hold infinite relative attributes, such as existence and non-existence, permanence and impermanence, oneness and manyness, and expressibility and inexpressibility, by substance, place, time and state and without conflict with perception and inference, and substance, taste, potency and vipaka likewise coexist without contradiction; Sushruta is said to have written relying on this syadvada, so that it is accepted by him too.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 625Hindi commentaryTraditional description

Where else is this mentioned?

Named 7 times on 5 pages. These are automatic name matches, so a few may refer to something else with the same name.

Questions and answers

How does the hitahita chapter argue that no substance is wholesome or unwholesome in every respect?

It rejects the one-sided view that water, ghee, milk and rice are absolutely wholesome and fire, alkali and poison absolutely unwholesome: if the former were wholesome everywhere and always, people with new fever, diarrhoea, kushtha, fistula-in-ano, eye disease or wounds would have to take them constantly, while alkali, fire, instruments and poison used by skilled physicians relieve diseases at once.

Detailed answer and sources
What does the hitahita chapter, quoting Sushruta, say about substance, taste, potency and vipaka?

There is no vipaka without potency, no potency without taste and no taste without substance; substance is the most important, because taste, potency and vipaka depend on it, and the eight qualities called potency rest in substance, not in the tastes.

Detailed answer and sources
Why does the Hindi rendering of the hitahita chapter hold that no substance is wholesome or unwholesome in every respect?

Because by substance, place, time and state things have many-sided natures; if water, ghee, milk and food were wholesome in every way, they would have to be used even in new fever, diarrhoea, kushtha, fistula-in-ano, eye diseases and wounds.

Detailed answer and sources

All references

Every page and verse of the source that this entry draws on.

Extraction notes

  • आद्र्रतमेव is read as आर्हतमेव, matching the chapter's opening sentence.

Quick facts

Content type
Principle
Source pages with records
6
Pages naming it
5
Extraction tasks
T29, T30
Record id
concept_syadvada