Skip to content

Principleसिद्धांत

Rasa panchaka (five pharmacological attributes)

रस पंचक · रसपञ्चक

Extracted from the text3 references

Built from passages of the source by the curated extraction. Pending human review.

Names and synonyms

Sanskrit
रसपञ्चकद्रव्यगुण
Hindi
रस पंचकद्रव्यगुण
English
Rasa panchakarasa panchakapharmacological attributesdravyaguna
Romanized
rasa panchakadravyaguna

What the text says

Each statement reports the source, with its chapter, page and verse. Traditional descriptions are not presented as proven medical facts.

Other5

  • The text calls faulty the one-sided views of those who see substance, taste, potency and post-digestive effect as separate: if taste, potency and vipaka were different from the substance they would be seen apart from it like a cow's horns, and if they were not different the four words would be mere synonyms, like Indra, Shakra and Purandara; so the four are in some respects different and in some respects one.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 609Sanskrit verseTraditional description
  • Quoting Sushruta, the text says the wise accept the combined action of all four: some substance acts on a dosha by itself, some through its potency, some through its taste and vipaka; there is no vipaka without potency, no potency without taste and no taste without substance; and substance and taste arise in mutual dependence, like the body and the embodied soul.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 610Sanskrit verseTraditional description
  • A footnote gives the reading of the printed Sushruta Samhita for one line of the quotation: substances are digested in substance, not the six tastes.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 610FootnoteTraditional description
  • Some one-sided teachers take substance, taste, potency and vipaka separately, as sweet, sour and pungent, which the translation calls very faulty: if the potencies were different from vipaka they would be seen apart, like a cow's horns, and if they were not different they would be synonyms of one thing, like Indra, Shakra and Purandara; so the four are in some respects different and in some respects the same.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 625Hindi commentaryTraditional description
  • The learned give primacy not to any one but to the combination of all four: a substance sometimes removes or produces doshas by its own nature and sometimes through its vipaka; there is no vipaka without potency, no potency without taste, and taste cannot exist apart from substance, so substance is the best; substance and quality arise in mutual dependence, like body and soul.

    Appendix: Hitahita · p. 625Hindi commentaryTraditional description

Where else is this mentioned?

Questions and answers

What does the hitahita chapter, quoting Sushruta, say about substance, taste, potency and vipaka?

There is no vipaka without potency, no potency without taste and no taste without substance; substance is the most important, because taste, potency and vipaka depend on it, and the eight qualities called potency rest in substance, not in the tastes.

Detailed answer and sources

All references

Every page and verse of the source that this entry draws on.

Quick facts

Content type
Principle
Categories
Dravyaguna
Source pages with records
3
Pages naming it
1
Extraction tasks
T29, T30
Record id
concept_rasa_panchaka