Skip to content

Questionप्रश्न

How does the hitahita chapter argue that no substance is wholesome or unwholesome in every respect?

हिताहिताध्याय यह कैसे सिद्ध करता है कि कोई द्रव्य सर्वथा हितकर या सर्वथा अहितकर नहीं है?

Extracted from the textNew name from the text2 references

Names and synonyms

No alternate names recorded.

Answer

Study question (generated from the text)

It rejects the one-sided view that water, ghee, milk and rice are absolutely wholesome and fire, alkali and poison absolutely unwholesome: if the former were wholesome everywhere and always, people with new fever, diarrhoea, kushtha, fistula-in-ano, eye disease or wounds would have to take them constantly, while alkali, fire, instruments and poison used by skilled physicians relieve diseases at once.

Detailed answer

Its examples include poison treating poison, fire treating burns, the excision and burning of a bite and bloodletting with sharp instruments. Arguing from syadvada, it concludes that because things are many-sided, all things are incompatible or compatible according to substance, place, time and state, and that the first medical science is that of the Arhat.

All references

Every page and verse of the source that this entry draws on.

Quick facts

Content type
Question
Source pages with records
2
Pages naming it
0
Extraction tasks
T29
Record id
qa_T29_05