Skip to content

Questionप्रश्न

On what grounds does the translation say that meat is not a medicine?

भावानुवाद किन आधारों पर कहता है कि मांस औषध नहीं है?

Extracted from the textNew name from the text3 references

Names and synonyms

No alternate names recorded.

Answer

Study question (generated from the text)

It is not taken up in the sections on collecting medicinal substances, is neither purifying nor pacifying, has no taste of its own, and has no time or measure of use laid down for it.

Detailed answer

Meat lacks the power to purify upward, downward or both ways, and having no particular taste of its own it cannot pacify doshas as the tastes do. None of the ten times for taking medicine is fixed for it, and no measure is given for it as for liquids, fats, powders and pastes. It is not read in the rasayana chapter and is opposed to milk. The closing argument concludes that meat is not food, nor a well-known medicine, nor an excellent rasayana, and that honey, liquor and meat were mixed into the science later by people greedy of the tongue.

All references

Every page and verse of the source that this entry draws on.

Quick facts

Content type
Question
Source pages with records
3
Pages naming it
0
Extraction tasks
T30
Record id
qa_T30_05