Skip to content

Questionप्रश्न

How does the translation answer the doubt that plant medicines are also meat because they are bodies of living beings?

वनस्पति औषधियाँ भी जीव शरीर होने से मांस हैं, इस शंका का भावानुवाद क्या उत्तर देता है?

Extracted from the textNew name from the text2 references

Names and synonyms

No alternate names recorded.

Answer

Study question (generated from the text)

Meat is the body of a living being, but a living body need not be meat, just as a neem is a tree but not every tree is a neem.

Detailed answer

Where the pervaded (vyapya) is present the pervader (vyapaka) is present too, but not the reverse, as with shinshapa and tree. Just as woman is a name common to sister and wife yet one is approached and the other not, food (anna) and meat, though alike bodies of living beings, are one to be eaten and the other not. Grains, pulses, roots, fruits, flowers and leaves are described as fit for the worship of the gods and pure, and a physician devoted to true dharma cannot call them meat without contradicting perception, his own words, scripture and the world.

All references

Every page and verse of the source that this entry draws on.

Quick facts

Content type
Question
Source pages with records
2
Pages naming it
0
Extraction tasks
T30
Record id
qa_T30_07