The editor cites in support the famous archaeologist Rai Bahadur Narasiṁhācārya, M.A., M.R.A.S.…

The editor cites in support the famous archaeologist Rai Bahadur Narasiṁhācārya, M.A., M.R.A.S. (styled Prāktanavimarśavicakṣaṇa, Mahāmahopādhyāya and Prācyavidyāvaibhava), quoting him in English: another manuscript of some interest is the medical work Kalyāṇakāraka of Ugrāditya, a Jaina author who was a contemporary of the Rāṣṭrakūṭa king Amoghavarṣa I and of the Eastern Cālukya king Kali Viṣṇuvardhana V; the work opens with the statement that the science of medicine is divided into two parts, prevention and cure, and gives at the end a long discourse in Sanskrit prose on the uselessness of a flesh diet, said to have been delivered by the author at the court of Amoghavarṣa where many learned men and doctors had assembled. The editor then renders the passage in Hindi.

Why it is kept for review: The author's date and the plan of the work, as stated by an archaeologist the editor cites.

Another manuscript of some interest is the medical work Kalyankaraka of Ugraditya, a Jaina author, who was a contemporary of the Rashtrakuta king Amoghavarsha I and of the Eastern Chslukya king kali Vishnuvardhana V. The work opens with the statement that the science of medicine is divided into two parts, namely prevetion and cure,