The editor concludes that Pūjyapāda wrote a medical work named Kalyāṇakāraka, and rejects the…

The editor concludes that Pūjyapāda wrote a medical work named Kalyāṇakāraka, and rejects the view of some scholars that the Pūjyapāda who wrote the Sarvārthasiddhi and the Pūjyapāda who wrote the medical work were different men, or that the medical author belongs to the thirteenth century: the evidence, he says, shows that the same Pūjyapāda wrote on grammar, doctrine and medicine, and since Ugrādityācārya was a contemporary of Jinasena (to be shown later), Pūjyapāda's medical work must be much earlier.

Why it is kept for review: Jain medical tradition and the time of the author (Ugrāditya as Jinasena's contemporary).

कुछ विद्वान् वैद्यक-ग्रंथकर्ता पूजयपाद को 13 वें शतमान में डालकर उनमें भिौाता सिद्द करना चाहते हैं। परन्तु उपर्युक्त प्रमाणों से वे दोनों बातें सिद्द नहीं होती।